Help shape the future of procurement intelligence — assist BrightState in designing an AI-powered system that detects fraud, identifies anomalies, generates evidence, and empowers your team with actionable intelligence. Strengthening Scottish housing oversight

SentinelQX is an MVP fraud and risk intelligence system for UK housing procurement teams. We're inviting early partners to co-design the system, collaborate and validate outputs, and shape the roadmap through a structured assessment process — with the possibility of progressing to pilot.

Express interest in design/pilot participation

Benefits of AI assisted risk detection

Implementing automated fraud and anomaly detection provides significant financial upside and operational security for UK housing authorities and associations.

Potential Financial Savings

  • 1% Realisable Savings Benchmark: Robust fraud and anomaly-detection controls can credibly save a conservative 1% of total annual procurement spend.
  • £300k–£1m Annual Savings per Association: For a medium-sized housing association with a procurement spend between £30m and £100m, this equates to £300,000 to £1,000,000 in avoided losses every year.
  • £400 Million National Waste Reduction: Poor data quality and procurement inefficiencies cost the UK social housing sector an estimated £400 million annually; anomaly detection targets this "hidden" waste.
  • £33 Million Direct Fraud Mitigation: Detected procurement fraud specifically cost UK housing associations approximately £33 million in 2024, representing a direct target for recovery and prevention.

Benefits for Housing Procurement

  • 30–50% Staff Time Savings: Automated triage tools allow overstretched procurement teams to save up to half their time by focusing only on high-risk items rather than repetitive checking.
  • Early-Stage "Front-Door" Control: Detecting anomalies at the pre-payment stage prevents financial loss, as recovering funds after payment is significantly more expensive and often unsuccessful.
  • Automated Audit Defense: Detection systems generate a comprehensive audit trail for every decision, providing "defensible evidence" for the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) or legal proceedings.
  • Identification of "Micro-Frauds": Analytics can flag high-volume, low-value anomalies (averaging £2,708 per case) that are designed to bypass manual secondary authorisation thresholds.
  • Prevention of Mandate Fraud: Real-time monitoring flags suspicious changes to contractor bank details, preventing one of the most prevalent cyber-enabled procurement scams.
  • Detection of Bid-Rigging and Collusion: Advanced tools identify links between suppliers—such as shared directorships or physical locations—to prevent cartels and artificially over-inflated quotes.
  • Enhanced Compliance with Awaab's Law: Risk detection highlights inconsistencies in repair cycles, ensuring associations meet strict remediation windows and avoid costly disrepair claims and regulatory failure.

Procurement teams face volume, inconsistency, and governance gaps

High transaction volumes mean genuine risks get missed while alert fatigue from false alarms creates decision inconsistency across teams.

Weak audit trails and staff-dependent judgments make it harder to demonstrate governance maturity or defend decisions during regulatory review.

Decision support for procurement risk triage — not autonomous enforcement

SentinelQX is an AI-assisted triage tool trained on UK housing procurement data to flag anomalies such as inflated invoices, urgent bypass requests, bank detail changes, and supplier mismatches.

The system produces verdicts (NO_CONCERN, REVIEW, ESCALATE) with plain-language rationale and confidence scores, always placing human procurement teams in the final decision-making role.

Audit trails, explainable reasoning, and adjustable thresholds ensure transparency and proportionality, aligning with UNESCO human oversight principles, OECD explainability standards, and EU/UK risk-based governance frameworks.

Shape the product before commercial release

Early access to MVP capability with co-design input — your feedback directly influences threshold calibration, fraud module prioritization, and interface design.

Documented outcomes and governance evidence you can use for internal assurance reports, audit responses, and control maturity assessments.

Join a peer network of housing authorities testing governance innovation together, with structured evaluation reports and shared learning across the pilot cohort.

Design or pilot, or unsure / bit of both, that's fine too

Design Partner

Weekly check-ins during stabilization phase, threshold tuning feedback, data quality partnership, and co-authored case study at pilot conclusion.

Pilot Tester

Bi-weekly reviews during steady operation, KPI validation, governance checklist completion, and anonymized results contribution.

If you decide you might like to pilot SentinelQX there is a structured, time-bound validation process with clear deliverables

BrightState is a member of the NVIDIA Inception Programme and TechScaler cohort, with technical validation from AI accelerator partners.

SentinelQX is designed around UNESCO human oversight requirements, OECD transparency principles, and EU/UK risk-based AI governance frameworks from day one.

All pilot participants receive signed Data Processing Agreements, compliance alignment documentation, and control over data retention and deletion processes.

The 8-phase pilot process includes governance readiness checks, model cards with explainable reasoning, and documented audit trails at every decision point.

8-Stage Pilot Process (Click to view details)

Stage 1: System Registration & Initiation (Week 1)

30-minute scoping call to confirm pilot objectives, data requirements, decision-maker sign-off, and success criteria — with signed pilot agreement and assigned account owner.

Stage 2: Governance Readiness & Requirements Check (Week 1–2)

Self-scored governance checklist, 30-minute alignment call, and signed Data Processing Agreement to confirm legal, operational, and compliance preparedness before data ingestion.

Stage 3: Data & Model Setup (Week 2–3)

Technical connection to procurement data, threshold configuration, user account creation, and one-page model card explaining what SentinelQX flags and why.

Stage 4: Training & Go-Live (Week 3)

60-minute team training with 10 test cases, hands-on override practice, live data activation, and SLA documentation for support and escalation.

Stage 5: Stabilization (Weeks 4–5)

Weekly flag reports, 30-minute review calls, false-positive rate monitoring, and real-time threshold tuning based on your team's feedback.

Stage 6: Steady Operation (Weeks 6–9)

Bi-weekly check-ins, monthly rolling reports, risk re-assessment notes, and consistent performance monitoring as the system proves reliability over time.

Stage 7: Evaluation & Impact Analysis (Week 10)

Final pilot report with fraud detection outcomes, time-saved metrics, model performance summary, and 60-minute results discussion.

Stage 8: Transition Decision & Closeout (Week 11)

Renewal proposal with three options (continue, upgrade, or pause), secure data archive or deletion, and documented lessons for both parties.

Register your interest

Please enter your name
Please enter your organisation
Please enter your role
Please enter a valid email address
Please select an option

✓ Thank you! We'll be in touch within 3 working days.

Register interest